Our Commitment to Climate Change
(Response to TCFD Recommendations)
- Home
- Sustainability
- Our Commitment to Climate Change (Response to TCFD Recommendations)
Our Commitment to Climate Change (Response to TCFD Recommendations)
To help create a sustainable society, we have set quantitative and qualitative management targets to be achieved by 2030 as the Mid- to Long-Term Management Goals 2030, stepping up efforts to be carbon neutral by 2050. In July 2021, we announced our support for the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). This section shows our scenario analysis, strategies, indicators and targets in line with the TCFD framework for disclosure.
Governance and risk management
We established the Group Sustainability Committee to oversee the environmental activities of the entire group, and regard the organization as a key committee of the Group along with the Group Risk and Compliance Committee.
The Group Sustainability Committee, chaired by the president of the Group and attended by presidents of major group companies, meets once a year in principle. The committee discusses matters related to the enhancement of sustainability management, including the formulation of sustainability action plans and reviews of their progress, to modify existing measures and develop new measures in light of the current progress in achieving plans and targets, social and international circumstances, legal and regulatory trends, and changes in the external environment.
The significant environmental risks related to climate change that are discussed in the Group Sustainability Committee will be reported to the Group Risk and Compliance Committee. These issues then will be reported to the Management Strategy Meeting and the Executive Management Meeting, as necessary, to be reflected in our corporate strategies. The activities of the Group Sustainability Committee are reported to and supervised by the Board of Directors without delay after the committee meeting.
In fiscal 2021, we introduced a performance-linked equity compensation plan for directors (excluding outside directors). To enhance our sustainability efforts including climate change adaptation, we use a sustainability index as part of the basis for calculating the amount of equity compensation. The index is determined by taking account of the general progress of sustainability initiative targets and other ESG-related activities.
- *This chart is scrolled

Strategy
Selecting climate change scenarios
We referred to the climate change scenarios published by the International Energy Agency (IEA), and chose the 1.5℃, 2℃, and 4℃ warming scenarios. We have analyzed the impact of climate change over the period through 2030, as we understand that such impact becomes gradually apparent over the medium to long term. Our first scenario analysis conducted in fiscal 2021 covered metal and plastic containers of our domestic packaging business.

■ 4℃ scenario (equivalent to RCP 8.5)
Temperature is likely to be 3.2-5.4℃ above pre-industrial levels by the end of this century without stronger measures against global warming.
■ 1.5-2℃ scenario (equivalent to RCP 1.9-2.6)
Temperature rise could be reduced to 0.9-2.3℃ with stronger measures against global warming.
Process of scenario analysis
- Identifying significant
risks and opportunities -
- Gather information on risks and opportunities in the packaging industry.
- Identify potential transition and physical risks and opportunities for the Group from the perspectives of government policies and the market.
- Examine impacts of the identified risks and opportunities on our operations and specify significant risks and opportunities which may have material impacts.
- Collecting future prediction data
-
- Collect external future prediction data that is highly reliable on significant risks and opportunities.
- Organize the future prediction data for each scenario and internally discuss possible future prospects.
- Estimating business impacts
-
- Quantify business impacts of significant risks and opportunities for each scenario using collected future prediction data and in-house data.
- Taking countermeasures
-
- Consider measures to address climate change-related risks and opportunities with material impacts on our business.
- Develop a framework to take additional measures, as necessary.
Results of analysis
We have organized the major climate change risks and opportunities in Japan, where the Group conducts its packaging business, using external information, and collected future prediction data for the individual risks and opportunities. Based on the data, we have examined risks and opportunities following the transition to a zero-carbon society as well as physical risks and opportunities arising from climate change, in order to identify significant risks and opportunities that may impact our operations by 2030.
As a result, we have identified the risk of higher operating costs due to carbon taxes on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, among other risks, under the 1.5 and 2℃ scenarios in which policies against climate change are likely to be implemented. At the same time, we have confirmed that we can mitigate the impact of climate change to a certain degree by achieving GHG emission reduction targets in our Eco Action Plan 2030. From fiscal 2022, we have introduced an internal carbon pricing (ICP) program as a means of reducing risks and expanding opportunities. We apply our internal carbon price to CO2 emissions from capital investments, converting the emissions into cost values, which we use as a reference when making our investment decisions. Through these efforts, we will strengthen our operations in an environmentally friendly manner.
Going forward, we will expand the scope of our scenario analysis and assess impacts on glass and paper containers of our domestic packaging business and major products of our functional materials business.
Chart of analysis results
Transition risks and opportunities
- *This chart is scrolled
Significant risks and opportunities |
Time frame |
Description of risks and opportunities |
Financial impact assessed |
Financial impact of each scenario |
Current and future actions |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4℃ | 1.5-2℃ | |||||||
Carbon pricing/ national carbon emissions targets and policies |
Carbon tax burden |
Medium |
Carbon taxes are imposed on CO2 emissions from fossil fuels. |
Rise in operating costs due to carbon taxation on GHG emissions(1) |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Electricity price fluctuations |
Short |
Renewable energy charges surge as the power grid shifts to renewable sources. |
Fluctuations in operating costs due to electricity price variations |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Introduction of new regulations |
Decline in net revenue due to plastic taxation |
Medium |
Plastic taxes are imposed on packaging made of virgin plastic. |
Decline in net revenue when taking account of plastic tax burden |
![]() |
|
||
Compliance with the mandatory use of recycled plastics |
Medium |
A minimum percentage of recycled plastic used in beverage bottles is set. |
Rise in costs due to a higher ratio of recycled plastic in raw materials |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
Rise in base paper prices due to forest taxation |
Medium |
Base paper prices rise as a result of forest taxation on paper manufacturers. |
Rise in base paper costs due to forest taxation |
![]() |
|
|||
Fluctuations in raw material prices |
Rise in petrochemical material prices due to higher crude oil prices |
Short |
Petrochemical material prices fluctuate as the demand and supply balance and price of oil change. |
Fluctuations in costs due to changes in prices of oil and petrochemicals |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Rise in raw material prices due to carbon taxation |
Medium |
Taxation on CO2 emissions from oil and metal refining, coking, and paper and glass production pushes up raw material prices. |
Rise in costs of petrochemicals, steel, aluminum, base paper and glass due to higher carbon tax rates(1) |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Changes in consumer behavior |
Rise in demand for eco-friendly products |
Medium |
Eco-friendly products gain competitiveness as consumer preference changes. |
Growth in sales of eco-friendly products due to greater environmental awareness |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Rise in demand for low-carbon and next-generation technologies |
Rise in demand for battery components due to growing popularity of EVs and PHEVs |
Medium |
Demand for EV/PHEV battery components and materials increases. |
Growth in sales of battery components and materials due to growing popularity of EVs and PHEVs |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
- Notes:
- 1. Financial impact under the 1.5℃ scenario
- 2. Targets in the Eco Action Plan 2030
Physical risks
- *This chart is scrolled
Significant risks and opportunities |
Time frame |
Description of risks and opportunities |
Financial impact assessed |
Financial impact of each scenario |
Current and future actions |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4℃ | 1.5-2℃ | |||||||
Rise in average global temperature |
Fluctuations in sales due to changes in output of agricultural raw materials |
Long |
Agricultural production fluctuates and demand for beverages grows as the average temperature rises. |
Fluctuations in packaging sales due to changes in production of barley, tea leaves, coffee beans and higher grade rice and demand for beer and tea drinks |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Rise in air conditioning costs in summer |
Medium |
Rising temperatures push up air conditioning costs in summer. |
Rises in air conditioning power consumption and operating costs due to rising temperatures |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Rise in base paper prices due to forest fires |
Long |
Pulp supply declines due to more frequent forest fires. |
Rise in base paper costs due to frequent forest fires |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||
Fluctuations in demand for insecticides |
Long |
Demand for insecticides grows as the average temperature rises in summer. |
Growth in sales of aerosol cans due to increased demand for insecticides |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||
Intensifying extreme weather |
Property damage and lost profits due to natural disasters |
Short |
Delays in production and suspension of product supply occur due to damage to our facilities caused by natural disasters. |
Property damage costs and lost profits arising from natural disasters |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Rise in insurance premiums |
Short |
Increased natural disaster risks for our facilities raise insurance premiums. |
Rise in insurance costs due to increased flooding and typhoons |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Financial impact :
Positive, 10 billion yen or more: | ![]() |
---|---|
Positive, less than 10 billion yen: | ![]() |
Positive/negative, less than 1 billion yen: | ![]() |
Negative, less than 10 billion yen: | ![]() |
Negative, 10 billion yen or more: | ![]() |
Indicators and targets
As a long-term goal for 2050, we aim to significantly reduce CO2 emissions to realize carbon neutrality. To this end, we have set CO2 emission reduction targets for 2030 in our Eco Action Plan 2030 as shown to the right. These targets have been approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) under its updated target validation criteria for the 1.5℃ scenario.

Changes in CO2 emissions from operations (Scope 1 and 2)(1)(2)(3)
- *This chart is scrolled

- Notes:
- 1.In November 2021, we raised the emissions reduction target from 35% less to 50% less, compared to fiscal 2019.
- 2.We have changed the scope of data collection to solely include Toyo Seikan Group Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries from the data disclosed in July 2022, excluding affiliates accounted for using equity method that were previously included, and therefore the figures published here are not comparable to those published previously.
- 3.We have corrected the double-counting of emissions we found for some overseas subsidiaries and accordingly revised the sums of emissions from domestic and overseas operations for previous fiscal years.
GHG emissions from supply chain (FY2021)(1)
- *This chart is scrolled

- Notes:
- 1.We have changed the scope of data collection to include Toyo Seikan Group Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries from the data for fiscal 2019, including all overseas consolidated subsidiaries, which were previously excluded from the scope, and therefore the figures calculated with the new scope are not comparable to those calculated with the conventional scope.
Future actions
Based on the scenario analysis conducted in fiscal 2021, we plan to expand the scope of the analysis to other businesses in fiscal 2022 and to include all our businesses in fiscal 2023.
- *This chart is scrolled
FY2021
- TCFD response (Level 1)
-
- Conduct TCFD scenario analysis
(impact assessment of product liability for plastic and metal products). - Examine items to be disclosed based on TCFD scenario analysis results.
- Conduct TCFD scenario analysis
FY2022
- TCFD response (Level 2)
-
Conduct scenario analysis regarding materials other than metal and plastic.
- Glass and paper
- Steel plate
- Functional materials
FY2023
- TCFD response (Level 3)
-
Conduct scenario analysis for all businesses.
- Engineering, filling and logistics
- Overseas
- TNFD response
-
Gather information on specific risks and opportunities that are related to biodiversity loss.
- Natural capital
- Water risk